« Whoopie! | Main | Bob Riley knows who his bosses are »

November 17, 2004

They're incredible

washingtonpost.com: GOP Pushes Rule Change to Protect DeLay's Post

Is it possible that the American people are insane? It's one thing to send back Bush, but to send back a Republican majority in the House, one utterly under the domination of this guy, is another matter. Now they're modifying the rules so he can keep his job after he's indicted. Next they'll probably change it so he can still be Majority Leader from a Texas prison cell.

Posted by Mac Thomason at November 17, 2004 09:19 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.bravesbeat.com/mt-tb.cgi/7345

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference They're incredible:

» Disgusting from Leaning Towards the Dark Side
The House Republican leadership House Republicans proposed changing their rules last night to allow members indicted by state grand juries to remain in a leadership post, a move that would benefit Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) in case he is... [Read More]

Tracked on November 17, 2004 04:56 PM

Comments

I think this is just a glimpse of the kind of sh*t we can expect until 2008.

Posted by: Susan at November 17, 2004 02:09 PM

I found the comment from Delay's spokesperson stating that members should "make up their own minds" extremely entertaining. Yeah right. That's going to happen.

I can accept that arrogance is part of the process. But I can't tolerate arrogance on behalf of people like Delay. He doesn't know a moral from a morel.

Posted by: 50PoundHead at November 17, 2004 02:36 PM

Ha! Or shitake from s**t!

Posted by: Linkmeister at November 17, 2004 04:20 PM

Who knows, maybe he'll be exonerated in fine fashion like Siegelman.

Recalling the old Email of all the things pending and past of criminal or legal nature against a previous session of Congress I really doubt he'll get off, but who knows.

Posted by: Kenny at November 17, 2004 09:09 PM

If I recall correctly, the rule on suspending officers under indictment not only was a Republican innovation of the nineties, but came at a time when DeLay was a rising power in the GOP House leadership. Maybe it's the hypocrisy that's the worst part of it. Nah, it's just that it's Tom DeLay, whom I loathe, and who has far too much power over the other Republicans in Congress.

Posted by: Mac Thomason at November 17, 2004 09:32 PM

Correct; that 'innovation' came about during the Dan Rostenkowski (sp?) trial in the early 1990's. The GOP wanted to make their moral superiority clear. Now that their "morals" have become inconvenient, the GOP is abandoning them.

BTW: They're claiming that this is a 'political prosecution'. First of all, what the hell was the Clinton impeachment? Secondly, this Democratic DA in Texas who's going after DeLay has rankled politicians of all stripes. A report I heard yesterday said there are plenty of Democratic politicians in Texas who wouldn't spit on this DA if he were on fire. In the wake of that knowledge, the 'political prosecution' bit doesn't sound too credible--not that it ever did.

Posted by: Susan at November 19, 2004 06:25 PM

Getting rid fo Tom DEeLay would have been the best thing the GOP could do. Now if the Democrats put Ford, Jr., Davis (your Congressman), Gene Taylor, Bishop, Berry, McNulty....well they're your kind fo Democrats too... in charge, they could pose a good challenge. The Senate Democrats were smart with putting Reid in charge. He has a lot more center appeal than Dodd.

Posted by: Green Baron at November 20, 2004 09:31 AM

I wish they would. But I think it's always going to be the nature of the House to be in control of -- at the least -- members of the "center" of the party, which is always going to be far left or right of the electorate. It's just that DeLay is one of the most radical members of the GOP. It would be like putting Cynthia McKinney or someone in charge of the House Democrats.

Posted by: Mac Thomason at November 20, 2004 08:50 PM

A Cynthia McKinney who has lots of money and power to pass around, I think.

Posted by: Buck at November 22, 2004 05:45 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)